🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to resume atomic talks with Washington provided that it is approached with "respect" and "respect", Tehran's foreign minister has declared.

Abbas Araghchi stated solely negotiations was effective, and shared recent overtures had been made by intermediaries to restart negotiations with the American leadership. He said Iran did not have unreported enrichment locations, and Iran could not yet authorize the global atomic watchdog to inspect struck enrichment centers for protective measures.

Walking a Complex Path

The foreign minister is treading a challenging course since Iran does not want appear to be acting from a situation of vulnerability, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had arisen stronger militarily and emotionally from the joint assault on its atomic facilities in June.

He was addressing at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to refine atomic fuel on home soil that it will never give up" – the key factor of the deadlock in the prior discussions.

Earlier Negotiations Suddenly Concluded

The earlier sessions of negotiations between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and bitter termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with US support, attacked Iran's enrichment centers in a fortnight-long engagement that concluded with the American leader claiming the locations had been obliterated. Afterward, EU nations exercised their privilege to restore international penalties, but Iran asserts they have not had a major impact.

Magic Solution Suggested

Iranian officials claimed they felt they had reached a "perfect agreement" to the uranium processing matter in earlier negotiations, when it was agreed an Iran-based consortium with US participation could enrich uranium. The two nations would have been able to assert triumph since home-based processing would have persisted and the US could be confident that Iran's enrichment initiative was entirely non-military.

It had not been agreed in the talks that American atomic experts could function inside Iran, but that was a natural consequence of the cooperative offer. Officials asserted three times they had achieved a deal with Trump's special envoy the American negotiator only for the agreement to collapse due to "detractors in America".

Existing Position

Iran's diplomats said the partnership proposal was now withdrawn, but it seems very probable the proposal could be reintroduced in some form if talks reopen.

The American leader in recent days said he had been receiving messages that Iran sought to resume discussions, but confidentially Iran's diplomats say they are not yet receiving consistent overtures from America either straightforwardly or from significant local go-betweens, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Iran's state department has been charged of inactivity in the aftermath of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Iran says diplomacy is not part of a spectacle.

Political Position

In his remarks to the conference, intended to depict the US as a dominant force that misuses the notion of global regulations, the foreign minister said the two-week conflict revealed the dispute could not be settled by armed force. He asserted the strikes started with a American requirement for an unconditional Iranian surrender and ended with an complete request for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is certain the first strikes by Israel were mounted with complete American awareness and coordination, making confidence difficult to rebuild.

Negotiations Stays the Final Answer

Araghchi declared: "Tehran was not the one that had fled dialogue; it was the United States and the European states that had always attempted to enforce their will during the talks. Negotiations can still be alive and remains the primary solution to address disputes, but its standards, rules and fundamentals must be adhered to."

"In case they talk to the citizens of Tehran with the approach of respect and honor, they will obtain a response in the equivalent language."

Recovery and Rebuilding

In what is portrayed by Iran's diplomats as the battle of recovery and rebuilding, the foreign minister said he was assured Iran's security strengths "are considerably enhanced than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been rebuilt. We gained many lessons from this engagement; we have come to know our internal vulnerabilities and the vulnerabilities of the opponent."

He stated: "We effectively endured this conflict. Our atomic expertise, which they intended to destroy, continues to exist. The facilities and equipment, if damaged, will be restored; what is essential is the determination of the Iranian people and then the social solidarity that they targeted, but failed to break. The nation of Iran have grown more resilient, more united, and more backing of the government and the nation in the wake of this assault."